Thursday, August 31, 2017

After Harvey: Today's News for August 31st

Fox News:
A flooded chemical plant in a small town outside Houston was poised to explode, a spokeswoman for the French company that operates it said late Wednesday, though the timing and extent of the danger weren't immediately clear.

The Arkema Inc. plant in Crosby — about 25 miles northeast of Houston -- lost power Sunday and its backup generators amid Harvey's days-long deluge, leaving it without refrigeration for chemicals that become volatile as the temperature rises.

"The fire will happen. It will resemble a gasoline fire. It will be explosive and intense in nature," spokeswoman Janet Smith told the Associated Press.

There was "no way to prevent" the explosion, CEO Rich Rowe said earlier Wednesday.

In its most recently available submission from 2014, Arkema said potentially 1.1 million residents could be affected over an area of 23 miles in a worst case, according to information compiled by a nonprofit group and posted on a website hosted by the Houston Chronicle.
Remember all the laws and regulations we have to prevent incidents like this?
Arkema's plant is required to develop and submit a risk management plan to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, because it has large amounts of sulfur dioxide, a toxic chemical, and methylpropene, a flammable gas. The plans are supposed to detail the effects of a potential release, evaluate worst-case scenarios and explain a company's response. 
The problem is that government can never account for every single weird possibility in the future. This is why preventive law is a waste of time, creating more work that won't actually prevent anything, and will only serve as a tax upon law-abiding people.

In other Hurricane Harvey news...

CNN:
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie slammed Sen. Ted Cruz Wednesday morning over what he said was the Texas Republican's double standard in opposing Superstorm Sandy relief but requesting federal aid for Texas after Hurricane Harvey.

"I have no sympathy for this -- and I see Sen. Cruz and it's disgusting to me that he stands in a recovery center with victims standing behind him as a backdrop," he told CNN's Chris Cuomo on "New Day." "He's still repeating the same reprehensible lies about what happened in Sandy (and) called on Congress Wednesday morning to work fast on a bill to aid Texas after Hurricane Harvey."

Cruz said Monday he voted against a 2013 Sandy relief bill because it was "a $50 billion bill filled with pork and unrelated spending that wasn't hurricane relief."
Time for some TRUTH: By its very nature, disaster relief IS pork. It only benefits a small group of Americans at the expense of all of us.

Mind you, people can and should be charitable to other people suffering from a natural disaster. But government is the most inefficient way to accomplish this.

Finally, in non-Harvey news...

CNS News:
Americans on average spent more on taxes in 2016 than they did on food and clothing combined, according to data released this week by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

The same data also shows that in three years—from 2013 to 2016—the average tax bill for Americans increased 41.13 percent.

In 2016, according to BLS, “consumer units” (which include families, financially independent individuals, and people living in a single household who share expenses) spent more on average on federal, state and local taxes ($10,489) than they did on food ($7,203) and clothing ($1,803) combined ($9,006).

The average tax bill for American “consumer units” increased from $7,423 in 2013 to $10,489 in 2016, according to data released this week by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Elections have consequences.

Wednesday, August 30, 2017

Wednesday Wisdom: Paul Harvey


"In times like these, it's helpful to remember that there have always been times like these."--Paul Harvey (1918-2009)

Harvey in Louisiana: Today's News for August 30th

CNN:
New Orleans woke up with an uneasy sense of déjà vu Tuesday as it kept a wary eye on Tropical Storm Harvey while marking the 12th anniversary of Hurricane Katrina.

Katrina made landfall in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, on August 29, 2005, but its aftermath became the truly historic catastrophe. Federal levees and floodwalls crumbled, ushering powerful storm surge into the city and leaving 80 percent of New Orleans underwater for weeks. More than 1,500 people were killed and 200,000 properties were damaged.

...Harvey is expected to make landfall Tuesday night or Wednesday morning along the Louisiana-Texas border, said Andy Patrick, National Weather Service meteorologist-in-charge at the Lake Charles Weather Forecast Office. It will bring winds of 30-40 mph and a 2-4 foot storm surge.
This may seem light compared to what Texas went through, but remember that New Orleans is below sea level.

In other world news....

Bloomberg:
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un said the test-firing of a missile over Japan on Tuesday was a "meaningful prelude" to containing the American territory of Guam, adding he will continue to watch the response of the U.S. before deciding on further action. 
We really need to watch out for the imperialists in Guam.

End sarcasm.

This is just more silly saber-rattling from the North Koreans.

Speaking of world news....

Circa:
Fox News is being pulled off the air in the U.K. after failing to attract an audience, 21st Century Fox announced.

"Fox News is focused on the U.S. market and designed for a U.S. audience and, accordingly, it averages only a few thousand viewers across the day in the U.K.," the company said in a statement.

"We have concluded that it is not in our commercial interest to continue providing Fox News in the U.K."
Maybe they should change their motto to "Made for the USA"?

Back in the USA...

Los Angeles Times:
Of the dozens of organizations that turned out for Sunday’s mass protest against racism here, one group was impossible to miss.

Its members dressed head to toe in black, with masked faces and some bearing pastel-painted riot shields that read “no hate.” These 100 or so militants billed themselves as a security force for progressive counter-protesters, vowing to protect them from far-right agitators.

But as the protest got underway, some of those in masks would resort to mob violence, attacking a small showing of supporters of President Trump and others they accused, sometimes inaccurately, of being white supremacists or Nazis.

The graphic videos of those attacks have spurred soul-searching within the leftist activist movement in the Bay Area and beyond. Emotions remain raw in the wake of this month’s white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, Va., which left one woman dead and dozens injured. 
Trump received blistering criticism for equating the behavior of Klansmen and neo-Nazis to the actions of those who opposed them. Some fear that Sunday’s violence would only help advance the idea that the two sides are the same.

“This is food for the adversary,” said sociologist Todd Gitlin, a founder of Students for a Democratic Society, which organized the first national protests against the Vietnam War. He pointed out that violent acts committed by a few will almost always hijack the narrative of the entire protest, and that it is happening now should be no surprise. 
This goes both ways. Just because someone protests the removal of a Confederate statue, that does not make them a white supremacist. But because the KKK and some Nazis get involved, everyone gets the racist label.

Part of the problem is that too many people consider that hatred of racism is ok. There's an old saying that applies here: Hate the sin, but love the sinner. It is ok to hate racism, but when you hate the racist, you are crossing the line.

Tuesday, August 29, 2017

Tuesday Thoughts: Grover Cleveland

(hat tip to Wikipedia for the pic)

"I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution, and I do not believe that the power and duty of the general government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner properly related to the public service or benefit. A prevalent tendency to disregard the limited mission of this power and duty should, I think, be steadfastly resisted, to the end that the lesson should be constantly enforced that, though the people support the government, the government should not support the people. The friendliness and charity of our countrymen can always be relied upon to relieve their fellow-citizens in misfortune. This has been repeatedly and quite lately demonstrated. Federal aid in such cases encourages the expectation of paternal care on the part of the government and weakens the sturdiness of our national character, while it prevents the indulgence among our people of that kindly sentiment and conduct which strengthens the bonds of a common brotherhood."--President Grover Cleveland (1837-1908), from his veto of the Texas Seed Bill

More Harvey: Today's News for August 29th

Reuters:
Floodwaters from Tropical Storm Harvey are likely to rise as more torrential rain pounds the U.S. Gulf Coast, where at least eight people have already been killed in Texas and tens of thousands driven from their homes, officials said on Monday.

...Harvey has already dumped more rain in the past few days than some affected areas normally see in a year.

...The worst is far from over because the slow-moving storm will continue to dump rain over the next few days in an area hit by "unprecedented" flooding, the National Weather Service said.
The news gets worse:
And let's not leave Louisiana out of this:

Fox News:
Rescue crews raced to rush people and families to safety Monday night in the Houston area -- as Louisiana braced for flooding of its own from the megastorm known as Harvey.

Louisiana Gov. John Bel Edwards warned people in his state that “the worst is likely to come for us here.”

...“Harvey's circulation is crawling eastward and the center of the storm is forecast to track through the state of Louisiana later this week,” said Fox News Meteorologist Janice Dean. “The steady flow of winds over the Gulf will put Louisiana in line for a steady stream of heavy rain, including cities like Baton Rouge, Lake Charles and New Orleans.”

Southwestern Louisiana could get 15-20 inches of rain from Harvey. Flash floods warnings went into effect through Thursday as areas along the coast faced tropical storm warnings.

In other news...

Reuters:
North Korea fired a ballistic missile over Japan's northern Hokkaido island into the sea early on Tuesday, prompting warnings for residents to take cover while provoking a sharp reaction from Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and other leaders.

The test, one of the most provocative ever from the reclusive state, appeared to have been of a recently developed intermediate-range Hwasong-12 missile, experts said. It came as U.S. and South Korean forces conduct annual military drills on the peninsula, to which North Korea strenuously objects.
Imagine what would happen if Russia fired a ballistic missile off the coast of California? Now imagine what would have happened if that North Korean missile had "accidentally" fallen short and hit the Japanese island? There are over 5 million people on Hokkaido.

But the situation with North Korea was best described by the Australian leader:
Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said China, North Korea's main ally and trading partner, needed to do more.

"China has to ratchet up the pressure," Turnbull told Australian radio. "They have condemned these missiles tests like everyone else but with unique leverage comes unique responsibility."
At some point, the international community needs to hold China accountable for what North Korea is doing, especially since China has already stated they will defend North Korea if they get attacked.

Monday, August 28, 2017

Hurricane Harvey Hits Hard: Today's News for August 28th

Fox News:
Harvey sent devastating floods pouring into the nation’s fourth-largest city Sunday as rising water chased thousands of people to rooftops or higher ground and overwhelmed rescuers who could not keep up with the constant calls for help.

The dire situation prompted Gov. Greg Abbott to order another 1,000 National Guard members to Houston. Abbott said the state activated 3,000 National Guard and State Guard members as a result of the storm damage. He also said 500 vehicles and 14 aircraft had been put into service.

The death toll from the storm is at five. 
Soon to be six, and beyond. It is hard to judge the full extent of storm damage while the storm is still happening.

But as with any other decision that involves politicians, let the second-guessing begin:

CNN:
Sunday morning, as Houston residents found themselves trapped on rooftops and wading through flooded streets with children riding on their shoulders, Mayor Sylvester Turner defended his decision not to order evacuations before the city was hit by torrential rain from Hurricane Harvey.

Houston, which is known for its susceptibility for flooding because of its flatness, was never put under an evacuation order, voluntary or mandatory, even as then-Hurricane Harvey was threatening southeast Texas.

"You literally cannot put 6.5 million people on the road," Turner said in a press conference. "If you think the situation right now is bad, you give an order to evacuate, you are creating a nightmare."

But many in Houston were already living in a nightmare. They woke up to find they were trapped inside their flooded homes and unable to receive aid from first responders, who were inundated with more than 2,000 calls for help, according to Turner.
This is why evacuations are ordered IN ADVANCE. Turner knew the hurricane was coming, and he ignored the risks. Now he has to pay the price.

Admittedly, this is one of those political decisions that has downside regardless of how a mayor decides. If the mayor chooses to evacuate, and the storm isn't bad, he/she gets dinged for creating havoc. However, people should be a bit more sympathetic towards an overly cautious choice rather than one which puts peoples lives at risk.

In the case of Hurricane Matthew last year, Georgia Governor Nathan Deal ordered the evacuation of all parts of Georgia east of I-95 after the mayor of Savannah delayed ordering an evacuation (he was out of town at the time).

As for Texas, why didn't the governor evacuate Houston?
But there seemed to be confusion around what Houston residents should do, with Texas Gov. Greg Abbott appearing to call for an evacuation at a Friday press conference.

"If you wait until you realize how serious this condition is, you likely will find that it's too late for you to be able to evacuate," Abbott said.

When presented with the governor's comments in a separate press conference, Emmett said, "The other thing he said was, 'Listen to your local officials.'"

"Perhaps it was a bit of a mixed message, but he has assured me, that that is his message. Listen to the local officials."
If the residents of Houston weren't waiting for evacuation orders, do you think they would have evacuated on their own? The smarter ones would have, and the rest would have gotten one of these:


Overall, consider this a lesson in "don't rely on government" for your decisions.

In other news...

Politico:
President Donald Trump’s top aides and congressional leaders have made significant strides in shaping a tax overhaul, moving far beyond the six-paragraph framework pushed out in July that stoked fears about their ability to deliver on one of the GOP’s top priorities.

There is broad consensus, according to five sources familiar with the behind-the-scenes talks, on some of the best ways to pay for cutting both the individual and corporate tax rates. 
Before we go any further, explain how we cut taxes without cutting spending? The answer:
The options include capping the mortgage interest deduction for homeowners; scrapping people's ability to deduct state and local taxes; and eliminating businesses' ability to deduct interest, while also phasing in so-called full expensing for small businesses that allows them to immediately deduct investments like new equipment or facilities.
This isn't "cutting taxes". This is shifting them.

I know most people will look at lower tax rates as "cutting taxes", but that is just dog dumb. Here is a better idea: Get rid of ALL deductions, and then cut the tax rates. Too often, people, especially wealthy people, use deductions which only apply to a limited population (mainly wealthy people). Whatever happened to government "of the people, by the people, for the people"?

In still other news....

The Hill:
Russia’s army of media influencers, social media bots and trolls has increasingly amplified alt-right and far-right narratives in the United States since the 2016 presidential election.

Russia’s efforts to push propaganda and disinformation, experts say, are nothing new and extend beyond the U.S. to nations in Europe. But they have seemed to evolve in recent months, increasingly infiltrating and engaging with alt-right and far-right Americans online.

Moscow’s aim is widely viewed as exploiting divides and sowing distrust of democratic institutions, the latter a conclusion reached by the U.S. intelligence community in its initial investigation of Russia’s interference in the presidential election, including overt efforts to push propaganda.
So this is like what America's Leftist MSM does with the Alt Left? For example:

SFGate:
An army of anarchists in black clothing and masks routed a small group of right-wing demonstrators who had gathered in a Berkeley park Sunday to rail against the city’s famed progressive politics, driving them out — sometimes violently — while overwhelming a huge contingent of police officers.

Hundreds of officers tried to maintain calm in and around Martin Luther King Jr. Civic Center Park before the 1 p.m. “No to Marxism in Berkeley” rally, putting up barricades, searching bags and confiscating sticks, masks, pepper spray and even water bottles. The goal was to head off the type of clashes that sprang from similar rallies in the city earlier this year.

But once again, counterdemonstrators frustrated efforts by police, who numbered about 400. As the crowd swelled to several times that size, officers stepped aside and allowed hundreds of people angered by the presence of the right-wing rally to climb over the barriers into the park, said Officer Jennifer Coats, a spokeswoman for Berkeley police.

The masked counterprotesters, often referred to as antifa or antifascists, significantly outnumbered the people who had come for the rally, many of whom wore red clothing indicating support for President Trump. The anarchists chased away the right-wingers, and in one case four or five pummeled a man with fists and sticks before a radio host for Reveal, Al Letson, jumped in to shield the victim. Anarchists also attacked reporters who documented their actions.

By the time the confrontations wound down in midafternoon, police had arrested 13 people, including one for assault with a deadly weapon, Coats said. Most were accused of bringing banned items into the park. Six people reported non-life-threatening injuries, Coats said, including two taken to hospitals.
Say what you will about "Russian propaganda", but it is the violence of the Leftist Antifa groups that is talking much louder.

Jesus Christ said it best:
“Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles? Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.  A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them."--Matthew 7:15-20
Most of us already know the dangers of racism, as espoused by far Right groups like the Nazis or the KKK. Those dangers include race-based violence, similar to the kind of ideological violence being perpetrated by Antifa. These are the fruits of the false prophets of Leftist ideology.

But the danger here runs far deeper. We have to be prepared to reject both the racist ideologies of the Right and the violent authoritarianism of the Left. Hatred, whether centered in the ideologies of the Right or the Left, is never a good thing.

Friday, August 25, 2017

Weekly Finale: Taylor Swift versus Kanye West

This week's musical finale features the latest in a silly feud between singers.

The stars in this feud are Taylor Swift and Kanye West. The whole story is here if you want to read about it. But it got dredged up in today's news due to Swift's latest song, "Look What You Made Me Do", which is below:



While Swift has made quite a bit of good music (I covered her in more depth back in June), Kanye West's music is mostly trashy rap, with one notable exception, "Power":



"Power" was catchy, and the music video was arguably one of the finest I ever saw, done in the classic style of a renaissance painting.

As for their feud, I could care less. As Swift herself might say, it is time to "shake it off".

The lesson here is to let your feuds go. Haters gotta hate, but don't be one of them. You will enjoy your weekend much more.

Speaking of the weekend, I am out of here. I will return Monday with more blogging.

Hurricane Harvey: Today's News for August 25th

Fox News:
People filled sandbags and loaded them into cars and vans Thursday on South Padre Island, Texas. They planned to take the sandbags to their homes and businesses, to protect them from Hurricane Harvey.

Others in the forecast path of the storm -- the first major hurricane to hit Texas in 12 years -- sought out generators, plywood and other goods from hardware stores.
Anyone who has ever lived through a hurricane knows this drill.

Here is what we are potentially looking at with this storm:

AccuWeather:

Note that the worst of it hasn't happened yet. So it should be too early for politics to enter into it, right?

Salon:
...Hurricane Harvey is predicted to be the first major storm in a decade — and Trump just tweeted a useless promotional ad in preparation.

According to the White House, Trump was briefed on the government’s hurricane preparation efforts earlier this month, but his campaign-style commercial — fitted with a dramatic soundtrack — failed to convey any of that information to worried residents in the storm’s path. His tweet did not include basic information, like who is in danger, how to be prepared or what the government is doing to prepare. 
Begin sarcasm...

Everyone should seek out the president's advice in preparation for any natural disaster.

I have no doubt that Salon goes to Trump's Twitter feed whenever they need advice on anything, but especially hurricane preparedness.

End sarcasm.

In other Trump news...

Real Clear Politics:
Roger Stone, a former Trump campaign advisor and personal friend of the president, says if Congress votes to impeach President Donald Trump, there will be all-out Civil War in the U.S.

"The people who are calling for impeachment are the people who didn't vote for him. They need to get over it," Stone said to TMZ in an airport baggage claim on Wednesday this week.

"They lost. Their candidate had every advantage: They spent two billion dollars, we spent $275 million. Sorry, we whipped their ass. It is over. You lost," he said.

He added, warning: "Try to impeach him. Just try it. You will have a spasm of violence --an insurrection-- in this country like you have never seen before... Both sides are heavily armed, my friend."  
...Asked if he is saying that Trump's removal from office would lead to a Civil War, Stone said: "Yes, that is what I think will happen."
Stone is right. But the bigger problem isn't the risk of impeachment now, but rather the way-too-early talk about it. If it ever comes to pass, it will look a lot like "the boy who cried wolf", and the people who supported Trump will be less likely to believe even a credible case against Trump.

By threatening impeachment now, the Left actually solidifies Trump's hold on power by making their claims seem exactly what they are: Motivated by political bias with no basis in reality.

In other news...

Entertainment Weekly:
James Cameron claims “all of the self-congratulatory back-patting Hollywood’s been doing over Wonder Woman has been so misguided.”

The Terminator director told The Guardian in a new interview that the Patty Jenkins blockbuster is just “male Hollywood doing the same old thing” on account of the fact that he feels Wonder Woman as a character is “an objectified icon.”

“I’m not saying I didn’t like the movie but, to me, it’s a step backwards,” Cameron said.

Cameron is notable for putting actresses at the forefront of his action films, from Linda Hamilton’s Sarah Connor in Terminator and T2 to Sigourney Weaver’s Ripley in Aliens (that character originated in Ridley Scott’s 1979 blockbuster Alien). But according to the filmmaker, Connor has an edge on Wonder Woman when it comes to authenticity.

“Sarah Connor was not a beauty icon,” he said. “She was strong, she was troubled, she was a terrible mother, and she earned the respect of the audience through pure grit. And to me, [the benefit of characters like Sarah] is so obvious. I mean, half the audience is female!”
The reply from "Wonder Woman" director Patty Jenkins:
“James Cameron’s inability to understand what Wonder Woman is, or stands for, to women all over the world is unsurprising as, though he is a great filmmaker, he is not a woman,” Jenkins wrote in a note she posted to Twitter. “Strong women are great. His praise of my film Monster, and our portrayal of a strong yet damaged woman was so appreciated. But if women have to always be hard, tough and troubled to be strong, and we aren’t free to be multidimensional or celebrate an icon of women everywhere because she is attractive and loving, then we haven’t come very far have we. I believe women can and should be EVERYTHING just like male lead characters should be. There is no right and wrong kind of powerful woman. And the massive female audience who made the film a hit it is, can surely choose to judge their own icons of progress.”
First, Cameron is being sexist when he says that only hardcore strong female figures are acceptable or good or even advancing women's rights.

Second, what movie did Cameron watch? Wonder Woman was quite a strong figure. One can argue she was a little too perfect, and in that regard above the audience's empathy. However, based on the movie's results ($800 million box office and climbing), the people seem to "get" her, so that argument doesn't really have legs.

The flaw in Cameron's thinking is that female role models in movies have to be Clint Eastwood. God bless Linda Hamilton and Sigourney Weaver for their contributions to movie history, but to say ALL women have to be them is wrong in a different way: It creates a box of preconceived notions and forces all women into to live by them. This is every bit as bad as the old "all women are emotional fragile things".

Sadly, what Cameron is doing is Leftist thinking at its worst, trying to define people by their physical qualities instead of their individuality.

Patty Jenkins' response does EXACTLY the same thing, when she "womansplains" to him that he cannot possibly understand because "he is not a woman", thereby assuming that all men are incapable of empathy for women. Cameron does fall into that category, but Jenkins' use of that as a reason for why he is wrong is every bit as flawed as his reasoning.

Other than that, Patty's response was spot-on.

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Gerard Baker and Objective News Reporting

Here is what I consider the most important news story today, from the New York Times:
Gerard Baker, the editor in chief of The Wall Street Journal, has faced unease and frustration in his newsroom over his stewardship of the newspaper’s coverage of President Trump, which some journalists there say has lacked toughness and verve.

Some staff members expressed similar concerns on Wednesday after Mr. Baker, in a series of blunt late-night emails, criticized his staff over their coverage of Mr. Trump’s Tuesday rally in Phoenix, describing their reporting as overly opinionated.

“Sorry. This is commentary dressed up as news reporting,” Mr. Baker wrote at 12:01 a.m. on Wednesday morning to a group of Journal reporters and editors, in response to a draft of the rally article that was intended for the newspaper’s final edition.

He added in a follow-up, “Could we please just stick to reporting what he said rather than packaging it in exegesis and selective criticism?” 
The comments Baker sent to his reporters could be made about a significant portion of Trump's news coverage today.

(hat tip to Gerard Baker's Twitter account for the pic)

So what exactly was the issue Baker had with his reporters?
Several phrases about Mr. Trump that appeared in the draft of the article reviewed by Mr. Baker were not included in the final version published on The Journal’s website.

The draft, in its lead paragraph, described the Charlottesville, Va., protests as “reshaping” Mr. Trump’s presidency. That mention was removed.

The draft also described Mr. Trump’s Phoenix speech as “an off-script return to campaign form,” in which the president “pivoted away from remarks a day earlier in which he had solemnly called for unity.” That language does not appear in the article’s final version.
In addition:
In February, Mr. Baker fielded tough questions at an all-hands staff meeting about whether the newspaper’s reporting on Mr. Trump was too soft. Mr. Baker denied that notion, and he suggested that other newspapers had abandoned their objectivity about the president; he also encouraged journalists unhappy with the Journal’s coverage to seek employment elsewhere. 
But all is not as it seems:
But apprehensiveness in the newsroom has persisted. This month, Politico obtained and published a transcript of a White House interview with Mr. Trump conducted by Mr. Baker and several Journal reporters and editors. Unusually for an editor in chief, Mr. Baker took a leading role in the interview and made small talk with Mr. Trump about travel and playing golf.

When Ivanka Trump, the president’s older daughter, walked into the Oval Office, Mr. Baker told her, according to the transcript, “It was nice to see you out in Southampton a couple weeks ago,” apparently referring to a party that the two had attended.
Is it too much to ask that an editor somewhere actually had objective standards that weren't influenced by his personal associations?

At least he is doing the right thing, even if it is for the wrong reasons.

As for the Wall Street Journal reporter(s) who leaked this story to the New York Times, you need to go back to journalism school. Or is that where you learned to be a petty little Leftist tool?

Today's News for August 24th

Bloomberg:
President Donald Trump’s threats to shut down the government in October over border wall funding triggered concerns on Capitol Hill and could complicate Congress’s job of raising the debt ceiling.

Congress needs to pass a spending measure to keep the government open by Sept. 30 -- the same time it’s facing a deadline to raise the nation’s debt limit. GOP leaders don’t have a plan yet for how they’ll proceed but one likely scenario is to package the two measures together to get them to the president’s desk.

Trump’s shutdown threat may just be part of the routine bluster he employs in negotiations, but it still raises the specter of a potentially market-shaking showdown if he decides to follow through on it.
This is still a problem over a month away, and Trump is most likely bluffing. Yet this story seems to be front page news on most news sites.

So how do we get a month ahead in our lede news story?

The line of questioning goes like this:

  1. What really important stuff happened yesterday? Nothing.
  2. What really important stuff will happen today? Nothing.
  3. What really important stuff will happen within the next week? Nothing.
  4. What really important stuff will happen within the next month or so? Bingo!

Occasionally, you will get something really important happening far off that supersedes all other news, like "Asteroid to strike Earth next year, wipe out all life". But that is only every million years or so.

In other slow news...

The Guardian:
A UN committee charged with tackling racism has issued an “early warning” over conditions in the US and urged the Trump administration to “unequivocally and unconditionally” reject discrimination.

The warning specifically refers to events last week in Charlottesville, Virginia, where the civil rights activist Heather Heyer was killed when a car rammed into a group of people protesting against a white nationalist rally.

Such statements are usually issued by the United Nations committee on the elimination of racial discrimination (Cerd) over fears of ethnic or religious conflict. In the past decade, the only other countries issued with early warnings have been Burundi, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan and Nigeria.

The United States has been warned under the procedure in the past when Cerd raised the issue of land rights conflicts with the Western Shoshone indigenous peoples in 2006.

“We are alarmed by the racist demonstrations, with overtly racist slogans, chants and salutes by white nationalists, neo-Nazis, and the Ku Klux Klan, promoting white supremacy and inciting racial discrimination and hatred,” said Anastasia Crickley, chair of the committee.
Note this isn't over an actual racist action, such as a discriminatory law or segregation or even promoting racial preferences like affirmative action does. No, this is about idiots using their free speech rights.

Most countries in the world do NOT like free speech. so it should be no shock when the UN denounces free speech, especially when it comes from humanity's low-hanging fruit.

Now if all the UN is seeking is for "the Trump administration to unequivocally and unconditionally reject discrimination", they already did that. The MSM ignored it, and the UN found a perfectly good excuse to pile on Trump.

By the way, if you want to understand one of the key flaws in the UN, it is that it represents the countries of the world, but NOT the people of the world. The UN should be a bicameral body. when many of the nations represented at the UN are only representing dictatorships and rigged democracies, and not the people living under them, then the directives coming from said body are more representative of the leaders, not the people.

Wednesday, August 23, 2017

Wednesday Wisdom: Douglas Adams


"There are some oddities in the perspective with which we see the world. The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered planet going around a nuclear fireball 90 million miles away and think this to be normal is obviously some indication of how skewed our perspective tends to be, but we have done various things over intellectual history to slowly correct some of our misapprehensions."--Douglas Adams (1952-2001)

Trump vs. World: Today's News for August 23rd

Fox News:
A defiant President Trump rallied with his base for more than an hour Tuesday in Arizona, trashing the media over its coverage of his response to the recent violence in Charlottesville, Va., while criticizing the state’s Republican senators for not getting behind him.

...But Trump was most animated when defending himself against accusations he wasn’t forceful enough in condemning the white supremacists and racists who were protesting in Charlottesville earlier this month. He blamed the media for distorting his comments.

At one point, the president pulled a piece of paper out of his jacket and re-read his initial statements condemning the racists involved the protests.

“Did they report that I said that racism is evil?” Trump asked of the media. The crowd yelled, “No!”

“You know why?” Trump asked. “Because they are very dishonest people.”
...The Charlottesville violence led cities across the country to consider removing Confederate statues, something Trump railed against Tuesday.

“They’re trying to take away our culture, they’re trying to take away our history,” he said. 
A crowd of protesters formed outside the convention center Tuesday, but the president bragged that there were far more Trump supporters in attendance.

“All week, they’re talking about the massive crowds that are going to be outside,” Trump said. “Where are they?”

He then mocked liberal protesters who had been demonstrating.

“You know, they show up in the helmets and the black masks and they’ve got clubs and they’ve got everything,” Trump said.

Referring to the far-left militant protest group, Trump exclaimed: “Antifa!” 
Without specifically naming them, Trump dinged the state’s two Republican senators, Jeff Flake and John McCain, with whom he has sparred recently.

McCain, a frequent Trump critic who was recently diagnosed with brain cancer, irked the president by voting against the Senate’s recent plan to repeal and replace ObamaCare.

“One vote away – I will not mention any names,” Trump said of McCain.

Flake, who has battled with Trump on immigration, has been promoting a book that argues the GOP is in “denial” about the president.

Speaking of Flake, Trump said: “And nobody wants me to talk about your other senator, who's weak on borders, weak on crime. So I won’t talk about him.” 
Even though the guy is a fool, you have to love Trump's hubris. In this day and age where everyone is apologizing for everything, Trump stands above us all. Truly, in the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is now king.

Here, he further proves his half-vision:
Tuesday's rally came a day after Trump announced plans to send more troops to Afghanistan – an announcement he highlighted during his speech. “Did anybody watch last night?"

“Last night, as you know, I laid out my vision for an honorable and enduring outcome in a very tough place, a place where our country has failed, Afghanistan,” Trump said. 
He admits our Afghanistan policy has failed, so naturally he wants to continue it. If Trump isn't blind, he is at least myopic.

Anyway, that was the Fox News view on Trump's speech. Needless to say, the Left went off the deep end over Trump's speech:

CNN:
James Clapper, former director of National Intelligence, said Wednesday morning he questioned President Donald Trump's fitness for office.

"I really question his ability to be -- his fitness to be -- in this office, and I also am beginning to wonder about his motivation for it," Clapper told CNN's Don Lemon on "CNN Tonight."

Hours after Trump delivered a defiant speech in Phoenix, Arizona, Clapper said he found the President's rally "downright scary and disturbing."

Clapper denounced Trump's "behavior and divisiveness and complete intellectual, moral and ethical void."

"How much longer does the country have to, to borrow a phrase, endure this nightmare?"
This is hilarious. You can almost imagine the collective Left stomping and holding their collective breath, all at one time.

Admittedly, Clapper's interview was soft-spoken, and yet his rhetoric was every bit as inflammatory as something Trump might have said.

By the way, former government bureaucrats aren't the only people ticked at Trump:

New York Times:
The relationship between President Trump and Senator Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, has disintegrated to the point that they have not spoken to each other in weeks, and Mr. McConnell has privately expressed uncertainty that Mr. Trump will be able to salvage his administration after a series of summer crises.

What was once an uneasy governing alliance has curdled into a feud of mutual resentment and sometimes outright hostility, complicated by the position of Mr. McConnell’s wife, Elaine L. Chao, in Mr. Trump’s cabinet, according to more than a dozen people briefed on their imperiled partnership. Angry phone calls and private badmouthing have devolved into open conflict, with the president threatening to oppose Republican senators who cross him, and Mr. McConnell mobilizing to their defense.
Like the old saying goes, follow the money:
While maintaining a pose of public reserve, Mr. McConnell expressed horror to advisers last week after Mr. Trump’s comments equating white supremacists in Charlottesville, Va., with protesters who rallied against them. Mr. Trump’s most explosive remarks came at a news conference in Manhattan, where he stood beside Ms. Chao, the transportation secretary. (Ms. Chao, deflecting a question about the tensions between her husband and the president she serves, told reporters, “I stand by my man — both of them.”)

Mr. McConnell signaled to business leaders that he was deeply uncomfortable with Mr. Trump’s comments: Several who resigned advisory roles in the Trump administration contacted Mr. McConnell’s office after the fact, and were told that Mr. McConnell fully understood their choices, three people briefed on the conversations said.
There is no doubt Mr. McConnell is expecting nice hefty campaign contributions from those business leaders.

Finally, in news of the moronically PC (and this headline nails it):

Outkick the Coverage:
In a story that seems made for The Onion, but is actually true, according to multiple Outkick fans inside ESPN MSESPN decided to pull an Asian college football announcer named Robert Lee off the William and Mary at University of Virginia college football game because they were concerned that having an ASIAN FOOTBALL ANNOUNCER NAMED ROBERT LEE would be offensive to some viewers.

Did I mention that Robert Lee is Asian?
Just when you think this story can't get any dumber:
UPDATE: ESPN ISSUES OFFICIAL STATEMENT ON MOVING ROBERT LEE FROM VIRGINIA GAME: 
“We collectively made the decision with Robert to switch games as the tragic events in Charlottesville were unfolding, simply because of the coincidence of his name. In that moment it felt right to all parties. It’s a shame that this is even a topic of conversation and we regret that who calls play by play for a football game has become an issue.” 
Note to ESPN: This is only an issue because YOU made it an issue.

Tuesday, August 22, 2017

Sun Tzu and Afghanistan

(hat tip to Alchetron for the pic)
What would the most famed military strategist of all time have to say about America's military strategy in Afghanistan? A lot, and not much of it good. Following are his quotes, from The Art of War (followed by my comments).
"What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations...There is no instance of a nation benefiting from prolonged warfare."
Even in ancient times, 16 years would be considered "prolonged operations".
"Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win."
While there are elements of military strategy to this, there is also a political calculation here. A leader doesn't send his soldiers off to war unless he is certain they can win. Listening to Trump's Afghanistan speech, there are several quotes that stand out:
As we send our bravest to defeat our enemies overseas -- and we will always win... 
This is the definition of hubris.

Additionally, Trump said:
First, our nation must seek an honorable and enduring outcome worthy of the tremendous sacrifices that have been made, especially the sacrifices of lives. The men and women who serve our nation in combat deserve a plan for victory. 
In other words, we need to win because we have earned it. Sadly, fate doesn't care whether you "deserve it" or not. As Sun Tzu might say, you go to war to win, and not because you are "entitled". He would have laughed at the very thought.

Even worse, Trump gave the very reason why Afghanistan is a fool's war:
Third and finally, I concluded that the security threats we face in Afghanistan and the broader region are immense. Today, 20 U.S.-designated foreign terrorist organizations are active in Afghanistan and Pakistan -- the highest concentration in any region anywhere in the world.

For its part, Pakistan often gives safe haven to agents of chaos, violence, and terror. The threat is worse because Pakistan and India are two nuclear-armed states whose tense relations threaten to spiral into conflict. And that could happen.
In other words, even if we "win" in Afghanistan, the terrorists will just move next door to Pakistan. Based on this, the obvious solution is to attack both countries. Attacking a nuclear-armed Pakistan is suicide. Hence, we cannot attack it, and therefore we cannot ever completely defeat the terrorists.

Finally, Sun Tzu had this piece of advice which is almost tailor-made for President Trump and the United States:
"Move not unless you see an advantage; use not your troops unless there is something to be gained; fight not unless the position is critical. No ruler should put troops into the field merely to gratify his own spleen; no general should fight a battle simply out of pique. If it is to your advantage, make a forward move; if not, stay where you are. Anger may in time change to gladness; vexation may be succeeded by content. But a kingdom that has once been destroyed can never come again into being; nor can the dead ever be brought back to life. Hence the enlightened ruler is heedful, and the good general full of caution. This is the way to keep a country at peace and an army intact."

Trump Gets the Bear: Today's News for August 22nd


Read on to understand why...

Associated Press:
President Donald Trump declared Monday night the United States must continue fighting in Afghanistan to avoid the "predictable and unacceptable" results of a rapid withdrawal from the country where the U.S. has been at war for 16 years.

In a prime-time address to the nation, Trump said his "original instinct was to pull out," alluding to his long-expressed view before becoming president that Afghanistan was a unsolvable quagmire requiring a fast U.S. withdrawal. Since taking office, Trump said, he'd determined that approach could create a vacuum that terrorists including al-Qaida and the Islamic State could "instantly fill."
In other words, the American generals lobbied him and got their way, like they have done with the last two presidents.

Continuing:
Though his speech was billed as an announcement of his updated Afghanistan policy, Trump offered few specifics about what it would entail. He did not provide a number of additional troops that will be sent to the war, though U.S. officials said ahead of the speech they expect him to go along with a Pentagon recommendation for nearly 4,000 new troops.
"We will not talk about numbers of troops or our plans for further military activities," Trump said. "Conditions on the ground, not arbitrary timetables, will guide our strategy from now on."

There are roughly 8,400 American forces in Afghanistan now. At its peak, the U.S. had roughly 100,000 forces there, under the Obama administration in 2010-2011.

Trump said the American people are "weary of war without victory."

"I share the America people's frustration," Trump said at the Army's Joint Base Myer-Henderson Hall, in Arlington, Virginia, across the Potomac River from the White House. Still, he insisted that "in the end, we will win."
So how do we win? What is our definition?

Fox News:
President Trump outlined a comprehensive new strategy Monday night for achieving a “lasting peace” in Afghanistan – rejecting what he called “arbitrary timetables” for the U.S. troop presence, ratcheting up pressure on Pakistan to stop harboring militants and vowing to refocus the mission on “killing terrorists,” not nation-building.

“From now on, victory will have a clear definition: attacking our enemies, obliterating ISIS, crushing Al Qaeda, preventing the Taliban from taking over Afghanistan, and stopping mass terror attacks against America,” Trump said, in a primetime address to the nation.
Have you noticed the flood of terrorists coming from Afghanistan? Of course not, because our forces have been there for 16 years, right? Well that would mean they were coming from there before, right? Actually, no, most of the 9/11 terrorists were from Saudi Arabia. Osama bin Laden was the primary guy planning 9/11, and he was in Afghanistan at the time, although even he was originally from Saudi Arabia.

The general argument is that terrorists use Afghanistan as a place to stage attacks elsewhere. The problem with this argument is that terrorists move to other places and haven't stopped. Google "terrorist attacks since 9/11", and you can see plenty of charts that show how terrorism has increased. here is one from The Daily Mail:


If anything, it looks like the terrorists are thriving under our current "war on Islam" stance. If this were a stock chart, it would be called "bullish".

There is an economic theory which states that government subsidies of a good or service encourages more of it in the free market. So what happens when government subsidizes war?

Senator Rand Paul gets the last word on this:

The Hill:
The Trump administration is increasing the number of troops in Afghanistan and, by doing so, keeping us involved even longer in a 16-year-old war that has long since gone past its time.

The mission in Afghanistan has lost its purpose, and I think it is a terrible idea to send any more troops into that war. It’s time to come home now.

Our war in Afghanistan began in a proper fashion. We were attacked on 9/11. The Taliban, who then controlled Afghanistan, were harboring al Qaeda, and after being warned, and after an authorization from Congress, our military executed a plan to strike back. Had I been in Congress then, I would have voted to authorize this military action.

But as is typical, there was significant mission creep in Afghanistan. We went from striking back against those who attacked us, to regime change, to nation-building, to policing their country for them. And we do it all now with an authorization that is flimsy at best, with the reason blurred, and the costs now known. We do it with an authorization that was debated and passed before some of our newest military personnel were out of diapers. This isn’t fair to them, to the American people, or to a rational foreign policy.

The Afghanistan war going beyond its original mission has an enormous cost. First and most important is the cost to our troops. Deaths, injuries and unnecessary deployments causing harm to families are certainly the most important reason as to why you don’t go to wars that aren’t necessary.
Then comes the taxpayer. We have spent over $1 trillion in Afghanistan, and nearly $5 trillion on Middle East wars in the past 15 years. Would we not be better off with $5 trillion less in debt or using these funds in other, more productive ways?

Monday, August 21, 2017

Eclipsing Sanity: Today's News for August 21st

The funniest thing about today's solar eclipse? People will be travelling for hours to go someplace to look at something that they cannot see. And then they will travel hours to return home, not having seen it.

I have a special present for those folks:


Back to the "Trump is a racist, ineffective, Russian spy, Nazi" news...

CNN:

CNN's lede today is another Stephen Collinson anti-Trump screed. But at least there is a news story in here somewhere:
Donald Trump will ask Americans Monday to trust him on his new Afghanistan strategy, exercising a president's most somber duty, a decision on waging war, at a time when his own political standing is deeply compromised.

Trump will make his first prime-time broadcast to the nation as president at 9 p.m. ET to unveil his new plan, and a potential escalation of the nation's longest war, after a lengthy period of deliberations that carved deep splits within his administration.
There is an assumption in this lede editorial that could be wrong: What if Trump decides to pull us out of Afghanistan?

While that doesn't sound like Trump's normal tough guy persona, it does make sense. Why address the nation to escalate this already ongoing waste of our country's money as well as the wasted lives of our young men? Nobody would blink twice if he did that, because the war is popular on both sides of the political spectrum, mainly because most Americans are too busy watching "Game of Thrones" to be bothered with government wasting money (a favorite of the Left) and lives (a favorite of the Right). Trump could let his press secretary handle an escalation, and nobody would care.

On the other hand, if Trump pulled us out of Afghanistan, that will require some political explaining. However, the reasons for it are completely valid. We lose more by our involvement there than we gain. Between money, American lives, and even our diplomatic relations with countries bordering Afghanistan, there is no real upside. Historically, nobody has ever been able to tame Afghanistan, including the Brits and the Soviets.

One other TRUTH which gets ignored about Afghanistan: We went there to get Osama bin Laden after 9/11. Bin Laden was killed 6 years ago, so why are we still in Afghanistan?

Having said all that, it is possible, and maybe even probable, that Collinson is right.

Speaking of CNN...

Hot Air:
CNN published an article [Friday] based on interviews with members of Antifa. The headline notes, “Activists seek peace through violence.” That seems to suggest there’s a real problem with what Antifa is doing but the rest of the article comes across as sympathetic to the group, even to their violence...
You can read the Hot Air assessment above, and the CNN story here. But this obvious double standard by CNN, and even the Leftist MSM, is not unnoticed. If the Far Right is "evil" because of their long history of violence, what about the Far Left? Both Stalin and Mao were individually responsible for more deaths than Hitler.

But the Left's eternal effort to resurrect the communist movement ignores the flaws it has, both historically and even with its supporters today.

Speaking of Antifa...

The Daily Caller:
Yvette Felarca, the Berkeley area school teacher and militant left-wing protester responsible for organizing the riot at the University of California, Berkeley in February 2017, claims that violence against the far-right is “not a crime.”

Felarca, who belongs to “By Any Means Necessary,” a far-left group, is currently facing assault charges after she was caught on video assaulting a white supremacist during a July 2016 rally in Sacramento, Cali.
The school teacher and her compatriots engaged in violent clashes against members of the far-right Traditional Worker’s Party, which had a permit to march in the city. The violence between the two groups resulted in a number of assaults and multiple stabbings. In July 2017, police charged Felarca with “assault by means of force likely to inflict great bodily injury, participating in a riot, and inciting a riot.”

As reported by Huffington Post on Wednesday during her arraignment, Felarca described her actions as a form of self-defense, and therefore “not a crime.”

“Standing up against fascism and the rise of Nazism and fascism in this country is not a crime,” she said. “We have the right to defend ourselves.”
Considering communism was far deadlier than fascism, are we allowed to commit acts of violence against them too? Felarca might not be so willing to concede that point.

Friday, August 18, 2017

Weekly Finale: (I Never Promised You A) Rose Garden

After this week's mass hysteria, I decided a more positive song was needed for this week's musical finale.

Lynn Anderson's "(I Never Promised You A) Rose Garden" is just what the doctor ordered:



Released in 1970, this version reached #1 on the country music charts and #3 on the Billboard charts.

Although the song has been covered multiple times, the covers really don't stray far from Lynn Anderson's version. However, the version by the song's writer, Joe South, is arguably the worst:



So now you know why you have heard of Lynn Anderson, but not Joe South.

As for the song itself, even though it seems to be a mild romantic criticism, it actually has one of the most positive lines in all of music:
So smile for a while and let's be jolly love shouldn't be so melancholy
Come along and share the good times while we can
That may be the best advice going into a weekend. Enjoy the good times while you can, and I will return with more blogging on Monday.

Cats and Dogs Living Together: Today's News for August 18th

Mass hysteria? Scott Adams nails it today with his blog post, "How To Know You’re In a Mass Hysteria Bubble". 

And for a more rational discussion of why this hysteria is wrong, try David Harsanyi's "If The Left Won’t Acknowledge Leftist Violence, It’s No Better Than Trump".

But you know the hysteria is bad when even terrorists can barely get onto the front page of Fox News or CNN. But this website's policy is to ignore all but the most heinous of terrorist attacks (think 9/11), so if you really need to see the latest news on it, and give terrorists a voice, here it is.

But back to the mass hysteria...

CNBC:
After corporate CEOs abandoned President Donald Trump, markets are worried Trump's key advisors and Cabinet members will be the next to leave him, threatening his economic agenda.

But political strategists doubt the key financial advisors like Gary Cohn, director of the National Economic Council or Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin are close to resigning. The two former Wall Street executives have high credibility in the markets and are viewed as key drivers of the Trump economic agenda, particularly tax reform.

...Stocks slumped Thursday morning as rumors circulated that Cohn was leaving the White House. They recovered slightly after it was denied by the White House, but selling again accelerated and the Dow closed off 274 points at 21,750, its worst day in three months.
If that isn't enough, CNN's lede story has become political commentator Stephen Collinson's personal anti-Trump screed:

CNN:
Donald Trump was never part of the Washington in-crowd.

Yet the President is fast losing the few friends he did have in the capital, following a wild period in which he offered cover to white supremacists and ignited a war of words with North Korea, leaving GOP allies in the crossfire.
Translation: Things haven't changed much for Trump. This is what CNN calls "news", or even "news analysis". This could be part of why Trump calls them "fake news".

On the Fox side...

Fox News:
Jason Kessler, who organized the “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Va., told Fox News late Thursday he's in hiding after getting a string of death threats.

Last Saturday, a car rammed into a crowd of counter-protesters in Charlottesville, killing one woman and injuring some 19 other people. The next day, protesters chased Kessler from a press conference he was trying to hold.

The nationalist blogger maintains his group is not a collection of white supremacists, but rather a “civil rights group.” He said he graduated from the University of Virginia, voted for Barack Obama in 2008 and once attended an Occupy Wall Street rally in Charlottesville.
His grievances are rooted in what he calls the identity politics of today. “Some are the discriminatory policies of affirmative action, college admissions, history books being rewritten, blaming American whites for slavery,” when it was a worldwide institution.

“Every culture had slavery,” he said.
While Kessler himself might be a reasonable person, he loses sympathy by associating himself with the white supremacist groups. Admittedly, he cannot stop white supremacists from showing up at his public demonstration, but he needs to take a stronger stand against them.

Then again, Kessler did vote for Obama. The guy is clearly a nut case.

Thursday, August 17, 2017

Two Directions: Today's News for August 17th

CNN:
America may soon face a question of leadership.

If a president is judged by a growing slice of the population to have abdicated his office's traditional imperative to provide steady, moral and unifying authority, where does the nation turn next?
This is the lede story on CNN's website. While news analysis can take the lede, this drops down into the realm of personal editorial.

The irony in this analysis is that Trump is arguably the person trying hardest to lead all Americans, and he gets rejected by both sides for his attempts, mainly because leading America is impossible. The middle ground from where recent presidents have led has disappeared.

Making things even more difficult:

Chicago Tribune:
Silicon Valley significantly escalated its war on white supremacy this week, choking off the ability of hate groups to raise money online, removing them from Internet search engines, and preventing some sites from registering at all.

The new moves go beyond censoring individual stories or posts. Tech companies such as Google, GoDaddy and PayPal are now reversing their hands-off approach about content supported by their services and making it much more difficult for "alt-right" organizations to reach mass audiences.

But the actions are also heightening concerns over how tech companies are becoming the arbiters of free speech in America. And in response, right-wing technologists are building parallel digital services that cater to their own movement.

Gab.ai, a social network for promoting free speech, was founded in August 2016 by Silicon Valley engineers alienated by the region's liberalism. Other conservatives have founded Infogalactic, a Wikipedia for the alt-right, as well as crowdfunding tools Hatreon and WeSearchr. The latter was used to raise money for James Damore, a white engineer who was fired after criticizing Google's diversity policy.

"If there needs to be two versions of the Internet so be it," Gab.ai tweeted Wednesday morning. The company's spokesman, Utsav Sanduja, later warned of a "revolt" in Silicon Valley against the way tech companies are trying control the national debate.

"There will be another type of Internet who is run by people politically incorrect, populist, and conservative," Sanduja said.
The Left is making a lot of white supremacist martyrs by attacking their free speech rights.

In other news...

Fox News:
Oregon has passed the nation’s most progressive abortion bill, requiring state insurers to provide free abortions for all, including illegal immigrants.

Gov. Kate Brown, a Democrat, signed the historic health bill Tuesday, after the Legislature approved it in July. It would require Oregon insurance companies to cover reproductive procedures, all on the taxpayers' dime.

The $10.2 million bill takes effect immediately, allocating $500,000 for abortions for the estimated 22,873 women eligible under the Oregon health plan, the Washington Times reported. This will include abortions for immigrants who are otherwise ineligible under the state’s Medicaid program.
Congratulations Oregon! Not only will the genocide of unborn humans continue, but you will pay for it too! Which side of the political divide is the Nazis again?

Wednesday, August 16, 2017

Wednesday Wisdom: Martin Luther King Jr.

(hat tip to Biography for the pic)

"How do you go about loving your enemies? I think the first thing is this: In order to love your enemies, you must begin by analyzing self. And I’m sure that seems strange to you, that I start out telling you this morning that you love your enemies by beginning with a look at self. It seems to me that that is the first and foremost way to come to an adequate discovery to the how of this situation. … some people aren’t going to like you. They’re going to dislike you, not because of something that you’ve done to them, but because of various jealous reactions and other reactions that are so prevalent in human nature. But after looking at these things and admitting these things, we must face the fact that an individual might dislike us because of something that we’ve done deep down in the past, some personality attribute that we possess, something that we’ve done deep down in the past and we’ve forgotten about it; but it was that something that aroused the hate response within the individual. That is why I say, begin with yourself. There might be something within you that arouses the tragic hate response in the other individual.

"...A second thing that an individual must do in seeking to love his enemy is to discover the element of good in his enemy, and everytime you begin to hate that person and think of hating that person, realize that there is some good there and look at those good points which will over-balance the bad points.

"...Another way that you love your enemy is this: When the opportunity presents itself for you to defeat your enemy, that is the time which you must not do it. There will come a time, in many instances, when the person who hates you most, the person who has misused you most, the person who has gossiped about you most, the person who has spread false rumors about you most, there will come a time when you will have an opportunity to defeat that person. It might be in terms of a recommendation for a job; it might be in terms of helping that person to make some move in life. That’s the time you must do it. That is the meaning of love. In the final analysis, love is not this sentimental something that we talk about. It’s not merely an emotional something. Love is creative, understanding goodwill for all men. It is the refusal to defeat any individual. When you rise to the level of love, of its great beauty and power, you seek only to defeat evil systems. Individuals who happen to be caught up in that system, you love, but you seek to defeat the system.

"...I think the first reason that we should love our enemies, and I think this was at the very center of Jesus’ thinking, is this: that hate for hate only intensifies the existence of hate and evil in the universe. If I hit you and you hit me and I hit you back and you hit me back and go on, you see, that goes on ad infinitum. It just never ends. Somewhere somebody must have a little sense, and that’s the strong person.

"...Somewhere somebody must have some sense. Men must see that force begets force, hate begets hate, toughness begets toughness. And it is all a descending spiral, ultimately ending in destruction for all and everybody. Somebody must have sense enough and morality enough to cut off the chain of hate and the chain of evil in the universe. And you do that by love.

"...There’s another reason why you should love your enemies, and that is because hate distorts the personality of the hater. We usually think of what hate does for the individual hated or the individuals hated or the groups hated. But it is even more tragic, it is even more ruinous and injurious to the individual who hates. You just begin hating somebody, and you will begin to do irrational things. You can’t see straight when you hate. You can’t walk straight when you hate. You can’t stand upright. Your vision is distorted. There is nothing more tragic than to see an individual whose heart is filled with hate. He comes to the point that he becomes a pathological case. For the person who hates, you can stand up and see a person and that person can be beautiful, and you will call them ugly. For the person who hates, the beautiful becomes ugly and the ugly becomes beautiful. For the person who hates, the good becomes bad and the bad becomes good. For the person who hates, the true becomes false and the false becomes true. That’s what hate does. You can’t see right. The symbol of objectivity is lost. Hate destroys the very structure of the personality of the hater. [...] when you start hating anybody, it destroys the very center of your creative response to life and the universe; so love everybody. Hate at any point is a cancer that gnaws away at the very vital center of your life and your existence. It is like eroding acid that eats away the best and the objective center of your life. So Jesus says love, because hate destroys the hater as well as the hated."

--Martin Luther King Jr., from "Loving Your Enemies" in 1957

The Ghost of Trayvon Martin: Today's News for August 16th

When Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman came together, it was a case of two people looking for trouble and finding each other. Nothing good ever comes from that.

The Charlottesville protest on Saturday was similar, with a bunch of racists and anti-racists looking for trouble, and finding each other. 

Fights broke out at the protest, and yet only one side, the racists, is called out for the violence. This isn't a defense of racism, but a statement of fact: It takes two people to have a fight, and multiple fights means a lot more than two people. It is easy to point to the racists and say, "Yes, but the only person to die was killed by a racist." But the punches thrown and countered created an environment of violence, where escalation becomes more likely.  

Which leads us to President Trump...

Yahoo News:
US President Donald Trump sparked another political firestorm Tuesday when he doubled down on his initial response to the violent white supremacist rally in Charlottesville that ended in bloodshed, saying there was "blame on both sides."

The Republican president -- who one day ago solemnly denounced racism and singled out the Ku Klux Klan and neo-Nazis as "criminals and thugs" -- also hit out at what he called the "alt-left" over the weekend melee.

Trump has faced days of criticism from across the political spectrum over his reaction to Saturday's unrest in the Virginia college town, where a rally by neo-Nazis and white supremacists over the removal of a Confederate statue erupted in clashes with counter-demonstrators.

The violent fracas ended in bloodshed when a 20-year-old suspected Nazi sympathizer, James Fields, plowed his car into a crowd of anti-racism protesters, leaving one woman dead and 19 others injured.

In a rowdy exchange with journalists at Trump Tower in New York, Trump made clear on Tuesday that he was fed up with continued questioning about the issue.

"I think there is blame on both sides," Trump said.

As he spoke, his new White House Chief of Staff John Kelly, a former Marine general, appeared displeased during the president's long tirade, standing rigidly.

"You had a group on one side that was bad, and you had a group on the other side that was also very violent. And nobody wants to say that, but I'll say it right now," Trump continued.

"What about the alt-left that came charging... at the, as you say, the alt-right? Do they have any semblance of guilt? (...) There are two sides to a story."

"What about the fact they came charging with clubs in their hands, swinging clubs? Do they have any problem? I think they do. As far as I am concerned, that was a horrible, horrible day,” Trump said.
The response from the Right-wing media:

Fox News:
The White House told allies Tuesday that President Trump was “entirely correct” to blame “both sides” for the protest violence in Charlottesville, fighting back at critics of his response, Fox News has learned.

A memo of talking points obtained by Fox News stated that during his remarks in the lobby of Trump Tower on Tuesday, the president was “entirely correct – both sides of the violence in Charlottesville acted inappropriately, and bear some responsibility.”

The memo also stated that Trump “with no ambiguity” condemned the hate groups that descended upon Charlottesville for the “Unite the Right” rally, and added the president has been “a voice for unity and calm,” and that he’s “taking swift action to hold violent hate groups accountable.”

It ended by saying both leaders and the media “should join the president in trying to unite and heal our country rather than incite more division.” The memo was distributed to allies of the White House in an effort to try to get conservatives on board to defend Trump.
And the other side:

CNN:
It took President Donald Trump two days to condemn by name neo-Nazis, the Klu Klux Klan and white supremacist groups involved in this weekend's bloody clashes in Charlottesville, Virginia.

It took him about half that time to reverse course.

"I think there's blame on both sides. And I have no doubt about it," Trump told reporters Tuesday during a terse, highly combative exchange about the deadly clashes Saturday at the "Unite the Right" rally.

"You had a group on one side that was bad and you had a group on the other side that was also very violent," the President said. "No one wants to say that, but I'll say it right now. You had a group on the other side that came charging in without a permit and they were very, very violent."

It was a moment that the President both seemed to want and to relish.
Actually, Trump's comments didn't "reverse course". It was more of a 45 degree move than a 180 degree. Instead of just blaming the far Right, he is bringing in the far Left for consideration in his condemnation.

Amid his hyperbole, Trump is right here. "Hating the haters" is not a valid counter-response to racism. Martin Luther King Jr. would have told you that.