I opted for Supergirl re-runs on the CW website over last night's debate. As far as this year's presidential election, if I have to eat dog food for the next 4 years, I would rather let someone else taste it first.
Based on what I saw from the MSM this morning, I think my choice was the right one. Consider this banner from CNN:
"Who won the debate"? Based on the headlines below it, Clinton must have been flawless, since the only negative stories are about Trump. No bias here, right?
Or maybe...
The Daily Caller:
During Wednesday night’s presidential debate, Chris Wallace held Hillary Clinton’s feet to the fire over allegations that the Clinton Foundation engaged in “pay-for-play” behavior when she served as secretary of state.(NOTE: Go to the website linked above for the video of this part of the debate.)
“There have been a lot of developments over the last ten days since the last debate,” Wallace posed. “I’d like to ask you about them. These are questions that the American people have, Secretary Clinton, during your 2009 Senate confirmation hearing, you promised to avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest with your dealing with the Clinton Foundation while you were Secretary of State.”
“Emails show that donors got special access to you,” he continued. “Can you really say you kept your pledge to that Senate committee, and what happened and what went on between you and the Clinton Foundation? Why isn’t it what Mr. Trump calls pay to play?”
“Well, everything I did as secretary of state was in furtherance of our country’s interests and our values,” Clinton responded. “The State Department said that.”
Clinton then listed what she described as all the “good” the Foundation does across the world before Wallace interrupted her.
“Secretary, respectfully, this is an open discussion,” Wallace noted. “A specific question went to pay for play. Do you want to address that?”
She did not.
I wonder how CNN missed this story? Maybe they were too busy covering this one:
ABC News:
When Donald Trump was asked at the third and final presidential debate if he will accept the outcome of the election, and if he loses, concede to the winner, the real estate mogul refused to say.
"I will tell you at the time," said Trump, who has frequently discussed voter fraud and a "rigged" system.
"I'll keep you in suspense, okay?" Trump told moderator Chris Wallace.
Hillary Clinton responded, "That's horrifying."
Trump had just earlier called the election "rigged."
"She's guilty of a very, very serious crime," Trump said of Clinton. "She should not be allowed to run. And just in that respect I say it's rigged."As you read here yesterday, the elections ARE rigged. For Clinton to suggest otherwise is the peak of disingenuousness, if not an outright lie.
If you still think vote-rigging is no big deal, consider this:
Gateway Pundit:
In the latest Wikileaks Podesta documents [chairman of Hillary Clinton's campaign] John Podesta actually says it is OK for illegals to vote if they have a driver’s license...
Almost half of California’s driver’s licenses went to illegal aliens last year.
12 states and the District of Columbia allow driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants.Before you say, "What about the nice immigrants from Mexico?", consider what would happen if one of our enemies decided to take advantage of our lax immigration laws to flood our country with voters? Once you open the floodgates to illegal voters, there is no limit to what can happen. It may not be just "nice Mexicans".
No comments:
Post a Comment